Re-using a Company Name After Liquidation: What Directors Need to Know About Section 216

Home » Blog » Litigation » Re-using a Company Name After Liquidation: What Directors Need to Know About Section 216
by Martin Kingman 
| 5 September 2025

Re-using a Company Name After Liquidation: What Directors Need to Know About Section 216

Liquidation is never easy. When a business can’t meet its debts, directors are left facing tough decisions-and sometimes unexpected legal pitfalls. One of the biggest traps is Section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

This piece of legislation is designed to stop what’s known as the “phoenix phenomenon”-when directors close down an insolvent company only to restart the same venture under a new name, leaving debts behind.

Sounds simple? In practice, Section 216 is one of the easiest rules to trip over, and the penalties for getting it wrong are severe.

Why Section 216 Exists

Insolvency law isn’t just about closing companies. It’s about protecting creditors, the public, and the business community.

Section 216 plays a vital role in keeping the process fair. It ensures that directors can’t simply “wipe the slate clean” at the expense of creditors. The rules are strict for good reason-and they’re enforced with criminal sanctions and financial penalties.

When the Rules Apply

    If your company goes into insolvent liquidation, you and anyone who was involved in managing the business during the previous 12 months are caught by Section 216.

    For five years after liquidation, you cannot:

    • Act as a director of a company with the same or a similar name
    • Be involved in the formation, management, or promotion of such a company
    • The law even applies when liquidation follows administration as an exit route.

    What Counts as a “Prohibited Name”?

    A prohibited name is:

    • Any company name used by the liquidated business in the 12 months before liquidation; or
    • Any name so similar that it suggests an association with the former company.
    • This is where directors often run into trouble-what seems like a “fresh start” may still fall foul of the rules.

    Are There Any Exceptions?

    Yes, but they’re far from straightforward:

    1. Court Permission – Apply within 7 days of liquidation, with a decision usually made within 6 weeks.
    2. Continuous Use – Where another company has used the name continuously for at least 12 months prior to liquidation.
    3. Business Purchase Exception – When assets are purchased from the liquidator, provided creditors are notified within 28 days and a notice is placed in the London Gazette.

    Each exception comes with strict conditions, and mistakes can be costly.

    Why Professional Advice Matters

    For directors, insolvency is stressful enough without the added risk of personal liability. Section 216 can feel like a minefield-but with the right guidance, you can avoid stepping on a legal trap.

    At Pro Legal Group, we:

    • Provide specialist advice on Section 216 restrictions
    • Work closely with Insolvency Practitioners to ensure a smooth process
    • Offer fixed-fee services, so you know exactly what you’ll pay

    Our goal is simple: to protect your future while keeping you compliant with the law.

    Final Thoughts

    If your business is facing liquidation, don’t assume you can simply start again under a new name. Section 216 makes that a criminal offence in most circumstances.

    The good news? With the right legal advice, there are legitimate ways to move forward.

    Get in touch with Pro Legal Group today to discuss your options and protect your next steps.

    Our Litigation services

    Litigation Overview

    Contractual Disputes

    Debt Recovery & Money Claims

    Shareholder Disputes

    Insolvency

    Landlord & Tenants

    Statutory Declarations and Affidavits

    Employment Law

    Civil Litigation

    Disclaimer: Legal Information, Not Legal Advice

    The information provided on this blog is for general informational purposes only and is presented by Professional Litigation Company Limited. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The content is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an advisor-client relationship between the reader and Professional Litigation Company Limited.

    While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the blog or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the blog for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

    Furthermore, the content provided may not reflect the most current legal developments and may be amended, repealed, or otherwise modified without notice. We recommend consulting with a qualified lawyer for advice on any specific legal issues or concerns you may have.

    In no event will Professional Litigation Company Limited be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this blog.

    Through this blog, you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of Professional Litigation Company Limited. We have no control over the nature, content, and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

    Every effort is made to keep the blog up and running smoothly. However, Professional Litigation Company Limited takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the blog being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

    Thank you for understanding.

    Professional Litigation Company Limited

    Related articles

    Employment Rights Act 2025

    Employment Rights Act 2025

    Major UK Employment Law Changes Are Coming: What Employers Need to Know for 2026 to 2027The upcoming two years will see some of the most significant shifts in UK employment law in over a decade. Following the introduction of the Employment Rights Act 2025, which was...

    Understanding the UK Debt Recovery Process: How We Work

    Understanding the UK Debt Recovery Process: How We Work

    Recovering unpaid debts can be a complex and time-sensitive process, whether you're dealing with unpaid invoices from individuals, businesses, or international clients. The First Step: Letter Before Action (LBA) Every debt recovery process begins with a Letter Before...

    Phoenix Companies: Understanding and Avoiding Abuse

    Phoenix Companies: Understanding and Avoiding Abuse

    Phoenix companies are entities that emerge following the insolvency of a predecessor company, often with the same directors and a similar business model. While the practice is not inherently illegal, it can be misused to evade liabilities, leaving creditors unpaid and...